Smart Research's Replies to Mainstream Wing Chun Practitioners

-
Many chunners have been regurgitating words to challenge Smart Research's revelations. As I don't wish to reiterate the points, I shall paste the replies that I had posted.

Case 1: This guy challenged me to a fight in Australia to pressure test the findings.

My response: Put it to the test? Did you know that the thing I'm debating about is the technical correctness and not the overall fitness and prowess of the body? I suppose you are talking about fighting like MMA, right? Fighting like an MMA competition involves physical fitness and so on. 

Technical correctness can be verified without full sparring. :) That means you isolate fitness (endurance, ability to get hit and so on) and other techniques. You only test the techniques such as Tan, Bong, Lap and so on, to see whether they can work individually. And to test my scientific revelations, you don't need me to be there and to fight with me. All you need to do is to get a few guys who aren't doing mainstream Wing Chun to test your mainstream Wing Chun techniques individually. :) Then, the next step is you learn my version of Wing Chun and try the experiments again to see whether mine works better than your previous mainstream Wing Chun techniques. 

Got the idea now? Lol. So, when can you test my findings and Wing Chun? Post the videos of the experiments. I look forward to seeing you refute my revelations. Just do it already. Haha


---
Case 2: A chunner debated about the efficacy if his mainstream Gang Sao. I told him that it was weak and it could break if someone kicked it. He defended it. So, I showed him a video.


0:31. Ding Hao tried to Gang, right? Did it work? His arm might break because of that weak block, right? Compare this against a Karate lower block. Which block might risk having your arm broken? Mainstream Gang. Why? Wrong execution.

That means it is indeed the technique which is creating the problem. Isn't it? That means it is indeed a scientific problem, isn't it?

---

Case 3: A chunner argued about the scientific method and this is my reply to him.

scientific approach: 1) Test the techniques individually. For example Pak or Sensitivity. Test whether the technique can indeed produce the claimed effect. 2) If the Pak fails to work almost every time, then, it's deemed as an unworkable technique. 4) Repeat the same test for other techniques. 5) Conclusion: If most or all techniques had failed to produce the claimed effect, that means this art is unworkable and it's basically a Pseudoscientific Martial Art. You don't even need the sparring test to confirm it anymore. No bloodshed and bruises are needed to debunk mainstream Wing Chun. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AI Chat GPT Debunks Mainstream Wing Chun

-
Join this list if you wish to participate in our webinar or seminar training to resolve your Wing Chun issues. Click here. This post further proves that mainstream Wing Chun is Unscientific. Disclosure   Mainstream Wing Chun  Mainstream Wing Chun Mainstream Wing Chun ---- Chat GPT 's analysis: "Great question. Let’s break this down from a purely scientific and biomechanical perspective—forgetting Wing Chun exists, and imagining a new martial art that teaches practitioners to jam their arms into the center of their body to perform blocks, diversions, and strikes. 1. Anatomical Considerations The arms have natural range of motion that allow them to move freely to the sides, diagonally, and forward. Jamming the arms into the centerline of the body restricts this range. The shoulders, elbows, and wrists are designed to work in coordinated arcs. Tucking or jamming them too tightly to the center introduces tension in the joints and limits fluidity. Shoulder impingeme...
Read more

Why Ancient Martial Arts Can’t Be Trained Like Modern Combat Sports – A Proven Analysis from an Expert

-
In martial arts, misconceptions about training methods are everywhere, even among seasoned practitioners. As an experienced martial artist and instructor, I want to clarify some of the most critical errors people make when training traditional techniques. This post isn’t just about tips; it’s a demonstration of the depth of my expertise—an understanding that most martial artists don’t have. To dive deeper into authentic training methods, check out my online Wing Chun course at [www.skilloneness.com](http://www.skilloneness.com). 1. Misconceptions Around Training Ancient Techniques on Punching Bags Many traditional martial artists don’t realize that practicing ancient strikes on a punching bag is fundamentally flawed. These techniques are designed to be executed against targets that are firmly grounded on the floor, simulating the reality of human contact and direct force application. When the target is free to move or sway backward, like a punching bag, it disrupts the strike’s purpose...
Read more

Losers of Mainstream Wing Chun

-
This blog post exposes the bad characters of mainstream Wing Chun practitioners. These guys (losers) post nasty stuff on Facebook to smear and ridicule people because they can't defend their unscientific mainstream Wing Chun after it is being exposed. I will be exposing their characters and doings here for the public to judge them.  There are a few guys who post stuff that is related to personal attacks. Instead of defending their Wing Chun with logical arguments, they choose to do personal attacks with videos, photos and so on (including online stalking). I'll post their Facebook content and update this blog post. Chris Riley, instructor of Ving Tsun Salisbury.  Facebook posts by Chris Riley: "Let me show you guys what a loser looks like” then posts the video of him kissing a dude 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Smart Research 🌈🌈🌈🌈💅💅💅💅💅" "Smart Research blah blah … same nonsense …. Keep trying mr lady fingers 🤣🤣🤣" "Smart Research you back to childish stupi...
Read more