Good Criticisms About Mainstream Wing Chun

-
Many chunners refuse to acknowledge that something is indeed wrong with their mainstream Wing Chun and they criticised Smart Research's online comments.

This thread contains some criticisms. Read them, chunners.


Smart Research has revealed the scientic reasons why mainstream Wing Chun is failing. You can read the book here https://www.everand.com/book/674459752/The-Wing-Chun-Revelations

You can also buy Smart Research Wing Chun course to fix the errors and make your Wing Chun more scientific and workable https://mydukaan.io/smartresearch/products/smart-research-wing-chun-snt?sku_id=46785237

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unraveling the Problems of the Mainstream Wing Chun Punch: Smart Research Insights and Criticisms

-
Image
The mainstream Wing Chun punch has been subject to substantial scrutiny in the martial arts world with numerous critics arguing that it is fundamentally unscientific. It's essential first to understand what this school of thought purports; Wing Chun is a unique form of close combat, where practitioners aim to land punches from a minimal distance. Notably, the inch punch is one tactic that has gained immense fame due to demonstrations by renowned martial artists such as Bruce Lee. However, there lies an underlying contradiction between its popularity and efficacy among critics. The detractors have taken issue with its implementation primarily; instead of delivering a quick, powerful blow, the inch punch of Wing Chun is often perceived as weak and resembles more a push than a traditional punch. A key point within these criticisms stems from the biomechanics involved. Smart Research suggests that there are significant issues concerning arm and fist alignment when executing this techni
Read more

Exposing the Flaws: Smart Research Unveils Mainstream Wing Chun Missteps

-
Smart Research has been uncovering the shortcomings and errors within mainstream Wing Chun, yet many practitioners are hesitant to acknowledge the deficiencies in their techniques and biomechanics. To illustrate these issues, let's conduct an experiment using the inner Pak Da exercise: YouTube video: Inner Pak Da 1) Find an untrained individual or someone unfamiliar with mainstream Wing Chun. Ask them to simply let you roll their arms without actively blocking your attacks or creating openings. Do not instruct them on how to roll; allow them to move naturally (or not at all). 2) Attempt to execute your inner Pak Da technique when opportunities arise. Repeat this experiment several times. Consider the following: 1) Were you able to effectively Pak and punch your partner most of the time, despite their lack of resistance? 2) Did you notice any clumsiness or jammed movements in your own arms while attempting your techniques? If you struggled to smoothly execute this combination techni
Read more

Chi Sao Should Resemble the Hard Style Technique of Bridging Arms

-
Someone inquired about the concept of Chi Sao. This is a short response to it  Many mainstream Wing Chun practitioners assume that it should look like Taiji's soft pushing hands - that's incorrect.  Chi Sao is akin to the hard style technique of Qiao Shou or Kiu Sao (橋手), involving the forceful clash of arms through striking, blocking, and diverting. It's intense sparring at close range without causing any actual harm. Chi Sao is similar to the content in the videos below. Video 1: Solo training Video 2: Two-person training Get Smart Research Wing Chun solution by clicking and visiting the links below Wing Chun Siu Nim Tao Book: Apple, Everand 
Read more