Unmasking the Unscientific Reality of Mainstream Wing Chun Chi Sao

-
Scientific analysis suggests that traditional Wing Chun practitioners may find their theories and techniques ineffective against individuals with different behavioral patterns. This post sheds light on the absence of scientific backing for Chi Sao practice. Upon viewing the accompanying video, you're encouraged to attempt the following experiment while wearing protective gear.

This is what mainstream Wing Chun Chi Sao looks like.


Now, run an experiment like in this video (below) to test the mainstream Chi Sao..

Experiment Objective: Assess the applicability of mainstream Wing Chun's stickiness, sensitivity, and techniques on non-mainstream practitioners who exhibit distinct behavior, devoid of artificial elements.

Setup: Enlist a prominent mainstream Wing Chun practitioner (preferably a well-known master) to engage in Chi Sao sessions with 10 fighters and untrained individuals.

1) Initiate Chi Sao hand movements. Non-mainstream practitioners should refrain from complying, merely extending their hands for the Wing Chun practitioner to interact with.

2) The non-mainstream Wing Chun fighter should engage in unhindered, light attacks without hesitation (attack randomly).

You should observe something like in this video.

The next video isn't about Chi Sao but it still shows that the "fanciful" techniques of mainstream Wing Chun can't be applied on someone who doesn't have the same mainstream Wing Chun behaviour.




Yet, Smart Research Wing Chun techniques could work against a Karate practitioner. And our guy was briefly trained in Smart Research Wing Chun. He was practicing Karate.


This shows that Smart Research Wing Chun is indeed authentic and scientific.

Conclusion: Chi Sao appears effective within the community due to shared unscientific behaviors, fostering synchronization and impressive displays. However, the purported sensitivity fails to translate to interactions with individuals (normal people who don't do mainstream Wing Chun) exhibiting diverse actions. Consequently, this martial art lacks validity, practicality, and scientific basis, reinforcing the observations of Smart Research.

Although I don't have an actual video of the correct Chi Sao here, when it's done correctly, it should look like this (this isn't a video about Chi Sao): Smart Research Wing Chun's continuous flow of hard striking and blocking

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unraveling the Problems of the Mainstream Wing Chun Punch: Smart Research Insights and Criticisms

-
Image
The mainstream Wing Chun punch has been subject to substantial scrutiny in the martial arts world with numerous critics arguing that it is fundamentally unscientific. It's essential first to understand what this school of thought purports; Wing Chun is a unique form of close combat, where practitioners aim to land punches from a minimal distance. Notably, the inch punch is one tactic that has gained immense fame due to demonstrations by renowned martial artists such as Bruce Lee. However, there lies an underlying contradiction between its popularity and efficacy among critics. The detractors have taken issue with its implementation primarily; instead of delivering a quick, powerful blow, the inch punch of Wing Chun is often perceived as weak and resembles more a push than a traditional punch. A key point within these criticisms stems from the biomechanics involved. Smart Research suggests that there are significant issues concerning arm and fist alignment when executing this techni
Read more

Exposing the Flaws: Smart Research Unveils Mainstream Wing Chun Missteps

-
Smart Research has been uncovering the shortcomings and errors within mainstream Wing Chun, yet many practitioners are hesitant to acknowledge the deficiencies in their techniques and biomechanics. To illustrate these issues, let's conduct an experiment using the inner Pak Da exercise: YouTube video: Inner Pak Da 1) Find an untrained individual or someone unfamiliar with mainstream Wing Chun. Ask them to simply let you roll their arms without actively blocking your attacks or creating openings. Do not instruct them on how to roll; allow them to move naturally (or not at all). 2) Attempt to execute your inner Pak Da technique when opportunities arise. Repeat this experiment several times. Consider the following: 1) Were you able to effectively Pak and punch your partner most of the time, despite their lack of resistance? 2) Did you notice any clumsiness or jammed movements in your own arms while attempting your techniques? If you struggled to smoothly execute this combination techni
Read more

Chi Sao Should Resemble the Hard Style Technique of Bridging Arms

-
Someone inquired about the concept of Chi Sao. This is a short response to it  Many mainstream Wing Chun practitioners assume that it should look like Taiji's soft pushing hands - that's incorrect.  Chi Sao is akin to the hard style technique of Qiao Shou or Kiu Sao (橋手), involving the forceful clash of arms through striking, blocking, and diverting. It's intense sparring at close range without causing any actual harm. Chi Sao is similar to the content in the videos below. Video 1: Solo training Video 2: Two-person training Get Smart Research Wing Chun solution by clicking and visiting the links below Wing Chun Siu Nim Tao Book: Apple, Everand 
Read more