The Disclosure of Wing Chun

Ian White let me use an analogy to make it more understandable for you. Mainstream Wing Chun=A fake gun with no actual parts of a gun. Someone sold it to Ip Man, Bruce and so on. It has never worked effectively but lots of myths about its efficiency is in the community. You all buy the story. No matter how much you believe in it, the gun isn't working because it doesn't have the actual design and parts of an actual gun. So, what's the point in asking me to have a gun fight with you? So that you can use another gun (kickboxing or MMA) to prove to me that your fake gun (mainstream Wing Chun) is effective? Chunners, unbrainwash yourselves. Sarah Carabot Han Yeoh William Dowding Abraham Mata Kevin Bonnick Chuck Lee Jimmy Thatcher Tim Franklin Ebmas Central James Philip Nathan Gaspoz Lothar Bjorkman Larry Brink Ricardo Delgado Chris West Terry Hayden Mike Gray Luke Wade

This short post delivers the final blow to the artificial centerline theory in mainstream Wing Chun, proving it to be pseudoscientific. If the centerline theory is a valid and scientific teaching, shouldn’t it be applied consistently across the entire body? So here’s the critical question: Why are your arms jammed into the center , but your kicks don’t come from the centerline ? Look at Chum Kiu or the Wooden Dummy forms—kicks are launched from natural leg positions, not from the middle of the body. Why? Because bringing the feet to the centerline before kicking would destroy balance, reduce power, and make you clumsy and ineffective. So why apply this faulty logic to the arms? Your legs aren’t disjointed because they’re not being forced into unnatural central positions. Your arms, on the other hand, become disjointed because the artificial centerline theory demands they be jammed toward the sternum—disconnecting them from your torso, hips, and natural kinetic chains. If you tried...

Mainstream Wing Chun practitioners keep challenging my findings by saying that sophisticated settings and experiments (empirical) should be used, so my findings aren't reliable. Is this true? Enter this in Chat GPT: "Is it a must to run sophisticated experiments or engage in sophisticated settings to verify something scientifically?" Chat GPT: "No, it's not a must to run sophisticated experiments or use advanced settings to verify something scientifically. What matters in science is clarity, repeatability, and logical reasoning —not how fancy the tools are. You can verify or disprove many things using: Simple, controlled experiments – even basic setups can isolate variables and test cause and effect. Observation and logical deduction – if something consistently happens under the same conditions, that’s a form of empirical evidence. Basic measurements and comparisons – like using a stopwatch, ruler, or camera to track movement or timing. Real-worl...

Join this list if you wish to participate in our webinar or seminar training to resolve your Wing Chun issues. Click here. This post further proves that mainstream Wing Chun is Unscientific. Disclosure   Mainstream Wing Chun  Mainstream Wing Chun Mainstream Wing Chun ---- Chat GPT 's analysis: "Great question. Let’s break this down from a purely scientific and biomechanical perspective—forgetting Wing Chun exists, and imagining a new martial art that teaches practitioners to jam their arms into the center of their body to perform blocks, diversions, and strikes. 1. Anatomical Considerations The arms have natural range of motion that allow them to move freely to the sides, diagonally, and forward. Jamming the arms into the centerline of the body restricts this range. The shoulders, elbows, and wrists are designed to work in coordinated arcs. Tucking or jamming them too tightly to the center introduces tension in the joints and limits fluidity. Shoulder impingeme...