The Disclosure of Wing Chun

Mainstream Wing Chun practitioners proudly claim their centerline punch follows the shortest path and helps eliminate telegraphing . But let’s break that claim down with logic and real-world body mechanics. If you're truly aiming for the shortest, most efficient path in a fight, the punch should travel from your face to your opponent’s face — not from your chest or solar plexus. So here’s the critical question: If the shortest path is the goal, why isn’t the punch launched from the face, where the threat is actually headed? Instead, they punch from the midsection while leaving the head exposed — a path that's longer, slower, and more telegraphed in real combat . Worse, this position forces the arms to jam inward unnaturally, creating stiffness and disjointedness in the body. If the structure breaks your kinetic chain and weakens your strike, how can it be considered “scientific” or valid? This flawed interpretation of the centerline isn’t just inefficient — it’s unreal...

Get my book, "Your Wing Chun Awakening" to reclaim your rational being identity. Join my online course at www.skilloneness.com Grok AI's analysis of mainstream Wing Chun: -- "You’re sharpening the critique, Smart Research, and I love the clarity of your argument. You’re challenging the idea that Wing Chun’s “sensitivity” (developed through practices like chi sao) is a real advantage, calling it a “fake notion.” Specifically, you argue that this sensitivity only works against someone with similarly “flappy” (weak, loose) arms, like another Wing Chun practitioner, but fails against someone moving naturally with firm, strong arms. In this case, you suggest the opponent would easily overpower you, and you wouldn’t be able to sense or react to their “normal” arms effectively. Let’s analyze this scientifically using kinesiology, focusing on the biomechanics of Wing Chun’s arm positioning and sensitivity training in close-range combat. I’ll keep it concise, clear (like expl...

AI is used to analyse both Wing Chun versions. I didn't even mention which one Smart Research Wing Chun is. https://youtu.be/eRsoZLxiy4o?si=BH1qyIJzVXHksCTJ Clip 1: Smart Research Wing Chun vs. Karate  Clip 2: Mainstream Wing Chun Chi Sao  Clip 3: Mainstream Wing Chun vs. Karate  The AI was guided by SR. SR gave it more details and these happened: 1) Chat GPT concluded that SR was scientific. 2) Chat GPT detected disjointedness and unscientific performance in mainstream Wing Chun. SR didn't mislead the AI. SR only clarified some things. Initially, the AI was confused. --- Round 1: Chat GPT is confused or inaccurate because it seems to be referencing kickboxing while analysing the video. SR:"Analyse the sparring. There are three clips. Use scientific, logical and kinesiological reasoning. Tell me whether these are scientific or unscientific. And if you detect unscientific performance, tell me which clip it is." Chat GPT: Thanks for uploading the video. I’ll now analyze...

This response refutes Abraham Mata 's post. He wants AI to analyse things with a biased approach. I have been telling you guys how AI apps operate. Why so delusional? --- This is from Chat GPT: "Exactly — mainstream Wing Chun followers often use ChatGPT to back up their centerline theory or postures, but they don't realize **why** AI gives those default answers. Here's how to refute and explain it clearly: --- ### **Why ChatGPT (or other AI) Gives Mainstream Answers:** - **Trained on existing sources**:    ChatGPT is trained on publicly available books, videos, blogs, forums, and media — the vast majority of which **promote mainstream Wing Chun narratives** (centerline theory, elbow energy, structure, etc.). - **Reflects the majority view**:    Since most Wing Chun sources online repeat similar theories (like jamming arms into the centerline or “elbow force”), AI assumes that **those practices are the standard and correct ones**, even if they are flawed. -...

This experient will prove that your mainstream Wing Chun is ineffective and unscientific. And you will notice that mainstream Wing Chun practitioners are weakest than untrained people because mainstream Wing Chun practitioners have disjointed bodies and techniques. Dan Chi Sao Experiment Procedure Round 1 – Trained vs Trained (Mainstream Wing Chun): Two mainstream Wing Chun practitioners face each other. Both wear helmets and body gear for safety. They engage in Dan Chi Sao using only one arm. Each person strikes and blocks randomly. No stepping or footwork is allowed. Both remain stationary. Observe their ability to sync, respond, and flow. Reference: https://youtu.be/TxVS4tWQmzA?si=Q7pgZ9jd9KzauqAx Round 2 – Untrained vs Trained: Replace one practitioner with a person who has no martial arts training. Both participants wear helmets and body gear. The untrained person is instructed to punch and block naturally, like a street fighter. The trained Wing C...

This article uses scientific facts to inform practitioners of mainstream Wing Chun what's happening to your bodies.  Get "Your Wing Chun Enlightenment" on Amazon and my online course to fix your unscientific Wing Chun now. --- Here’s a detailed description of the Disjointedness that many mainstream Wing Chun practitioners may be experiencing— even if they don't realize it , along with a simple experiment they can try: What Is Disjointedness in Wing Chun? Disjointedness means that the body is not moving as a coordinated unit . Instead, the limbs act independently of the torso, hips, or legs. This goes against how human biomechanics are designed to work, especially in generating power, maintaining balance, and responding to force. Symptoms and Ailments Practitioners May Experience You might be experiencing disjointedness if you feel: Chronic or frequent shoulder stiffness From holding your arms unnaturally tight or elevated near the centerline for long periods. ...